Skip to navigation
Login|Register
Log In

Remember me

RSS Feeds
Latest News

Online photo labs refuse to print copyright snaps

Online photo labs are increasingly refusing to make prints from digital images sent in by customers because the photographs are too good.

Copyright law prohibits photo labs from making prints of any image that is not owned by the customer in question. A combination of the ever improving technology built into digital cameras, the fall in the price of high-end cameras and the so-called digital SLRs, and the increasing use of Photoshop and other software packages to retouch and enhance images, is creating end results that are difficult to distinguish from the work of a professional.

In the pre-digital age, copyright was easy to determine: if you were in possession of the negative then in all likelihood you owned the photograph. Now that anyone can download images from the Internet, simply submitting them digitally proves nothing, so photo labs are erring in the side of caution.

Kodak has a gallery of professionally taken pictures on the walls of its EasyShare Gallery labs to warn its workers of the 'telltale signs' that a professional has been at work. Among the images commonly submitted by customers but taken by a pro are school photos and those posed, studio images of children.

'The majority of them are easy to spot,' said David Rich, vice president of marketing. 'We're doing our job as a good corporate citizen to protect the rights of others, just like we want our brand and our copyright to be protected.'

Currently this practice is largely confined to the US but European labs take an equally dim view of copyright infringement and encourage users to ensure that they read photo services' terms and conditions before uploading images.

There have been calls for a change in copyright laws to facilitate digital distribution, but this has yet to happen. The alternative is for professional photographers to increase their charges in exchange for giving away the image rights to their customers, but this would require some sort of copyright certification that is recognised by the various labs and such a scheme is a long way off, if not entirely impractical given the vast numbers of professional photographers.

Author: Simon Aughton

< Previous   News : Digital cameras Next >
Be the first to comment on this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Olympus SZ-14 review

Olympus SZ-14

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £165
Pentax Optio RZ18 review

Pentax Optio RZ18

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £127
Olympus SH-25MR review

Olympus SH-25MR

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £200
Fujifilm Finepix F770EXR review

Fujifilm Finepix F770EXR

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £273
Nikon Coolpix S9300 review

Nikon Coolpix S9300

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 2 out of 5
Price: £258
 

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
Computer Shopper

advertisement


advertisement


 
 

Expert Reviews Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.