Google Chromebook Pixel review

We couldn’t run our normal benchmarks as Chrome OS doesn’t support third party applications, so instead we used the JavaScript-based SunSpider online benchmark, which it completed in a speedy 225.9ms. For reference, our 3GHz Intel Core i3-540 processor completed the test in 297ms, showing that the Pixel is quick at what it needs to be quick at – rendering web content. It felt a little faster in use than the budget Chromebooks we’ve seen, but nothing to justify its price premium over them.

Its graphics are provided by its integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 chipset. Again, we couldn’t run our normal Dirt Showdown tests on the Pixel, but the frame rate was silky smooth in the Chrome version of Bastion, as well as other web-based games like Cut the Rope.

Bastion played smoothly and looked better than ever

Its speakers pull off a rather neat trick, considering they’re completely concealed inside the chassis, they had more than enough volume, so much so that you can actually feel the sound vibrating through the keys if you raise it above 25%. This can become a little distracting if you like listening to music while typing for long periods of time, but its impressive bass levels added a welcome richness to our test tracks that made it almost worth the irritation. They’re great little speakers for when audio quality isn’t key, maybe watching a TV programme or listening to radio.

Prolonged use made the Pixel rather warm, though we never had any stability problems. Google claim there’s a heat sink in there to help keep it cool, but we could feel a lot of heat emanating from both the keys and the back of the laptop, with the top of the keyboard tray getting particularly hot when playing games. We really don’t expect this from such a high-end product, although its lack of visible vents certainly cut down on the amount of fan noise it produces.

Another disappointment is its lack of connectivity options. Two USB2 ports, a mini-DisplayPort, an SD/MMC card reader and a combined headphone and microphone jack are all you get. It has dual-band Wi-Fi (and Bluetooth 3.0) to help you make the best of Google’s web-based Chrome OS. Luckily, you don’t have to be online all the time, as we had no trouble editing Google docs offline or reading and writing emails from the Offline Gmail app. That said, even Google devotees will be frustrated that the offline, Windows version of Google’s Picasa software is so much more powerful than the Picasa app for Chrome.

There’s not a great deal of ports provided

Most of your documents will be stored in the cloud, which is just as well as the Pixel only has a 32GB SSD for storage, which obviously doesn’t leave much room for anyone with a growing media collection. To help counteract this, each Pixel comes with a free 1TB of Google Drive storage for three years, you just have to redeem the offer on Chrome’s Goodies page to take advantage of it. After that, you’ll still be able to access your files and download them to another device, but adding any more files will require you to buy additional storage, which adds a potential extra expense on top of an already expensive laptop.

The SSD, and lightweight operating system, does means incredibly fast boot times, just nine seconds from shutdown to the user login page. The aversion to local storage on the Chromebook makes it a great device to share with others, the login screen has portraits for every user (from your Google account) and you simply pick your and enter your password.

The Pixel’s biggest flaw is its poor battery life. We couldn’t run our normal battery tests, but it only managed 3 hours and 56 minutes of looped video playback with the screen set to half brightness. This is one of the worst scores we’ve seen from a laptop, and a far cry from the impressive 7 hour battery life of the Samsung Series 3 Chromebook.

The Chromebook Pixel is an incredibly good-looking laptop, but ultimately it’s still a laptop whose sole purpose is to browse the web and so it really shouldn’t cost this much. As a result, its outstanding array of features feels somewhat wasted and unnecessary, and it completely misses the point about what made previous Chromebooks so attractive. They may not have had fancy screens or have been particularly fast, but they were cheap and Chrome’s limited ability as an operating system could be forgiven at such a price.

As it stands, Chrome OS is still too underdeveloped to justify this kind of expense, and if all you’re after is a fancy display then both Apple’s MacBooks and even the iPad are much better value. It may be the best Chromebook ever made, but right now Chrome OS just doesn’t do it justice. A high-end Ultrabook running Windows 8 with the Chrome browser installed is a far more flexible choice.