Skip to navigation

Apple iPod Nano 16GB review

Verdict:

Apple's latest iPod Nano is impressively slim, but audio quality and battery life could be better, while some of the extras feel gimmicky.

Review Date: 13 Nov 2009

Price when reviewed: £135

Buy it now for: £155
(see more store prices)

Supplier: http://store.apple.com/

Reviewed By: Alan Lu

Our Rating 4 stars out of 5

User Rating 5 stars out of 5

Powered by Reevoo

Apple's latest iPod Nano weighs just 34g and is no thicker than a pair of £1 coins, but Apple has squeezed in an FM radio and a video camera alongside its media playback features.

The video camera records in H.264 format at a resolution of 640x480 pixels. Video recorded in bright daylight looked reasonably detailed, but it turned grainy in low light. In our tests, the Nano's battery lasted one-and-a-half hours recording video. The only way to hold it without obscuring either the lens or the screen is by its sharp edges, which is uncomfortable. Surprisingly, the camera can't take still photos.

The integrated FM radio is a first for any iPod. Finding and bookmarking stations is simple. A 15-minute buffer lets you pause and rewind broadcasts, which is useful when listening to live sports, for example. It can't record entire broadcasts, though. On stations that support RDS metadata it can even identify songs being played and save these details so you can buy them later from the iTunes Store.

Beyond these new features, the Nano looks and feels almost identical to the previous model. The interface is as slick and easy to navigate as ever, although there's still no way to adjust the equaliser quickly.

Its battery lasted just over 32 hours playing music, which is a couple of hours less than the previous model. The included earphones are too quiet, lack bass and sound muddy. Even with quality headphones, music didn't sound as rich and warm as we'd expect and the bass wasn't quite as thumping as we'd like.

The 2.2in screen is too small for watching films regularly. It's very bright, though, with good contrast. Disappointingly, its battery lasted just over four hours when playing video, an hour-and-a-half less than the previous Nano.

Despite all its extra features, the 16GB Nano costs no more than most other 16GB MP3 players. The FM radio is a welcome addition, but the video camera feels gimmicky. We were also disappointed that the battery life and audio quality don't match the standard set by the previous-generation Nano. It's a good MP3 player, but Philips' Muse is even better.

Prev Next

User Reviews

Best Prices

Price comparison powered by Reevoo

£155
< Previous   Reviews : MP3 players Next >
Sponsored Links

advertisement

Award-winning MP3 players
Best Buy
Apple iPod Touch
Best Budget Buy
Sandisk Sansa Clip Zip

Sony Walkman NWZ-F886 review

Sony Walkman NWZ-F886

Category: MP3 players
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £290
Apple iPod Nano review

Apple iPod Nano

Category: MP3 players
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £115
Apple iPod Touch review

Apple iPod Touch

Category: MP3 players
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £249
Sony Walkman NWZ-Z1060 review

Sony Walkman NWZ-Z1060

Category: MP3 players
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £275
Sandisk Sansa Clip Zip review

Sandisk Sansa Clip Zip

Category: MP3 players
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £43
Sponsored Links
 

advertisement

Also in this category...
 

advertisement


advertisement


 
 

Expert Reviews Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.