EU increases pressure on UK Gov over privacy law concerns
Posted on 29 Oct 2009 at 14:39
The European Commission has announced that it has increased the pressure on the UK government and is now entering the second phase of its infringement proceeding because UK privacy and data protection laws don't line up with EU rules.
According to a statement released by the Commission, European laws state that EU countries must ensure the confidentiality of people's communications online by prohibiting unlawful interception and surveillance without the user's consent.
"People's privacy and the integrity of their personal data in the digital world is not only an important matter, it is a fundamental right, protected by European law," said EU Telecoms Commissioner Viviane Reding. "That is why the Commission is vigilant in ensuring that EU rules and rights are put in place."
Reding called on the UK government to change the law "to ensure that British citizens fully benefit from the safeguards set out in EU law concerning confidentiality of electronic communications."
The Commission launched its legal action following the UK government's response to the EU's original letter of formal notice sent in April this year. The original letter was sent after it received a number of complaints from British citizens regarding Internet Service Providers adopting behavioural advertising techniques.
EU Telecoms Commissioners say that there are three gaps in the current UK laws governing confidentiality of electronic communication:
- There is no independent national authority supervising interception of communications, despite being a requirement under the ePrivacy and Data Protection directives.
- The current UK law - the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) - authorises interception of communications not only if the persons concerned have consented to interception, but also when the person intercepting the communications has 'reasonable grounds for believing' that consent to do so has been given.
- The RIPA provisions prohibiting and providing sanctions in case of unlawful interception are limited to 'intentional' interception only, whereas EU law requires member states to prohibit and ensure sanctions against any unlawful interception, regardless of whether it was intentional or not.
The Commission said that the UK has two months to respond to the complaint and if there's either no response or the response is insufficient, the case may be referred to the European Court of Justice.
Author: Tim Smalley
Find a review
advertisement
Corel CorelDraw Graphics Suite X5
Category: SoftwareRating:
Price: £357
VMWare WorkStation 7
Category: SoftwareRating:
Price: £144
HDRSoft Photomatix Light
Category: SoftwareRating:
Price: £28
Mass Effect 2
Category: SoftwareRating:
Price: £20
Corel PaintShop Photo Pro X3
Category: SoftwareRating:
Price: £66
- Google plans to launch a TV platform
- Facebook "stalking" apps are all rogue
- PowerDVD 10 provides '3D upscaling'
- Outrage as Bioshock 2 publisher 2K Games charges extra for content already on install discs
- Malware found on new Vodafone smartphone
- Microsoft shows how a game can be played on Xbox or PC and continued on a Windows Phone 7 Series handset
- China says it's willing to prosecute Google hackers
- Monkey Island 2 special edition rumoured to be in development
- Google's latest acquisition targets Microsoft's most profitable business
- Epic Fail: The full extent of Steam's maintenance mess
advertisement
Compare 30+ mobile broadband deals




Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk
Social Bookmark this article: What is this?