Apple iPad review
Verdict:
LTE is unlikely to take off soon, but the retina display alone makes this new model worth having and the fact that neither battery life or price has changed makes it all the more impressive
Review Date: 20 Mar 2012
Price when reviewed: £399
Buy it now for: £290
(see more store prices)
Supplier: http://www.apple.com/uk
Reviewed By: Julian Prokaza
Our Rating
User Rating
![]()
Apple all but created the tablet market with the original iPad and, two years and 55 million sales later, other manufacturers are still struggling to compete. The latest iPad raises the stakes still higher, thanks to a huge 1,536 x 2,048 screen resolution and an unchanged price from the previous model.
One thing that hasn’t changed is its appearance, although this no-version-number ‘new iPad’ is 51g heavier and 0.6mm thicker than the iPad 2 - the extra thickness didn’t cause us any problems with our iPad 2 accessories, though.

Looks practically identical to its predecessor and is still available in black or white
The new iPad's standout feature is definitely its screen. It has the same 9.7in size and 4:3 aspect ratio as the iPad 2’s, but now has a ‘retina’ resolution of 1,536 x 2,048 pixels. In other words, Apple claims the individual pixels are now too small to make out at a typical viewing distance — something that the company has managed by cramming in some 3.14 million of them onto the screen. This gives a pixel density of 264 pixels per inch (PPI) - twice that of the iPad 2. To see how that matches up to other modern displays check out our Top 10: Displays in Consumer Technology.
Together with improved IPS panel technology that helps give more saturated colours and greater contrast, the result is a display that looks more like a gloss print from a high-end inkjet printer than a computer screen, and everything from text to photos looks incredibly crisp and colourful. Small text on web pages and documents is now perfectly legible without zooming in, too, which makes the iPad a much more useful tool for serious productivity. The retina display really needs to be seen in person to be appreciated, but a good way to imagine the improvement over the iPad 2 is to think about the difference in quality when moving from standard- to high-definition TV.

It's a fantastic display, with more detail than you can actually see
Apple has also beefed-up the new iPad’s processor. While the chip is essentially the same as the A5 used in the iPad 2, its ‘X’ suffix denotes a new quad-core graphics chipset. In benchmarks at least, processor performance is largely unchanged, but so is graphics performance — and this is quite a feat considering the new iPad's chipset has to handle four times as many the pixels as the iPad 2's.
User Reviews
Best Prices
Price comparison powered by 
| Prices, delivery and availability at 2 retailers | Go | |
|
£290 | Go |
|
£375 | Go |
What I most want is a definitive answer to the following question. DOES IT OVERHEAT?
By John_Simons on 26 Mar 2012 ![]()
Why 4:3?
Why on earth do Apple persist in releasing iPads with a 4:3 screen ratio when everything else on the market *including their own devices such as the iPhone* are all widescreen? The original iPad was perhaps forgivable but this is the third one now. Wake up Apple, 4:3 is dead!
By CeltiKaos on 26 Mar 2012 ![]()
Widescreen tablets?
What is the fascination with 'Widescreen' displays? Do we see in that format? Not really. Films have traditionally used Widescreen because cinema screens were easier to make wider than taller. But now we have loads of cheap 'widescreen' displays that are usually 1400x768, which is worse than the 6-year old laptop I'm writing this on. 4x3 is a good balance between 'Square' and 'Widescreen', and it can used in both protrait and landscape aspects depending on the situation. Can you imagine a 16x9 tablet held in portrait mode? Useless.
By Wilbert3 on 26 Mar 2012 ![]()
Widescreen tablets?
Um does shortscreen sound good?
It means the same thing!
By old_nic on 26 Mar 2012 ![]()
Widescreen tablets?
Um does shortscreen sound good?
It means the same thing!
By old_nic on 26 Mar 2012 ![]()
At last - an improvement in display resolution
Apple seems to have set a standard for the other manufactures to catch up with. For years we've been plagues with an ever decreasing vertical screen resolution. Absolutely useless for those who use large spreadsheets and want to edit two full page Word documents side by side. 16:9 displays? Not in my house. That's why I'm still using a 4 year old Dell laptop with a 1920 x 1200 display.
By Jaydax on 27 Mar 2012 ![]()
Find a review
advertisement
- Best Buy
- Google Nexus 10
- Best Budget Buy
- Packard Bell EasyNote TE11HC
- Best Business Buy
- Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon
- Ultimate
- Apple iPad 4
Acer Aspire Timeline U M5-581TG
Category: LaptopsRating:
Price: £600
Apple iPad Mini
Category: LaptopsRating:
Price: £269
Lenovo Ideapad Z585
Category: LaptopsRating:
Price: £399
Toshiba Satellite L955D-104
Category: LaptopsRating:
Price: £479
Toshiba Satellite U940-11N
Category: LaptopsRating:
Price: £550
Software Store
advertisement




