Login|Register
Log In

Remember me

Apple iPad review

  • iPad
  • iPad
  • iPad

Verdict:

LTE is unlikely to take off soon, but the retina display alone makes this new model worth having and the fact that neither battery life or price has changed makes it all the more impressive

Review Date: 20 Mar 2012

Price when reviewed: £399

Buy it now for: £290
(see more store prices)

Supplier: http://www.apple.com/uk

Reviewed By: Julian Prokaza

Our Rating 5 stars out of 5

User Rating 5 stars out of 5

Powered by Reevoo

ExpertReviews Award

Apple all but created the tablet market with the original iPad and, two years and 55 million sales later, other manufacturers are still struggling to compete. The latest iPad raises the stakes still higher, thanks to a huge 1,536 x 2,048 screen resolution and an unchanged price from the previous model.

One thing that hasn’t changed is its appearance, although this no-version-number ‘new iPad’ is 51g heavier and 0.6mm thicker than the iPad 2 - the extra thickness didn’t cause us any problems with our iPad 2 accessories, though.

iPad
Looks practically identical to its predecessor and is still available in black or white

The new iPad's standout feature is definitely its screen. It has the same 9.7in size and 4:3 aspect ratio as the iPad 2’s, but now has a ‘retina’ resolution of 1,536 x 2,048 pixels. In other words, Apple claims the individual pixels are now too small to make out at a typical viewing distance — something that the company has managed by cramming in some 3.14 million of them onto the screen. This gives a pixel density of 264 pixels per inch (PPI) - twice that of the iPad 2. To see how that matches up to other modern displays check out our Top 10: Displays in Consumer Technology.

Together with improved IPS panel technology that helps give more saturated colours and greater contrast, the result is a display that looks more like a gloss print from a high-end inkjet printer than a computer screen, and everything from text to photos looks incredibly crisp and colourful. Small text on web pages and documents is now perfectly legible without zooming in, too, which makes the iPad a much more useful tool for serious productivity. The retina display really needs to be seen in person to be appreciated, but a good way to imagine the improvement over the iPad 2 is to think about the difference in quality when moving from standard- to high-definition TV.

iPad
It's a fantastic display, with more detail than you can actually see

Apple has also beefed-up the new iPad’s processor. While the chip is essentially the same as the A5 used in the iPad 2, its ‘X’ suffix denotes a new quad-core graphics chipset. In benchmarks at least, processor performance is largely unchanged, but so is graphics performance — and this is quite a feat considering the new iPad's chipset has to handle four times as many the pixels as the iPad 2's.

Prev Next

User Reviews

Best Prices

Price comparison powered by Reevoo

£290
£375
< Previous   Reviews : Laptops Next >
Sponsored Links
User comments

What I most want is a definitive answer to the following question. DOES IT OVERHEAT?

By John_Simons on 26 Mar 2012

Why 4:3?

Why on earth do Apple persist in releasing iPads with a 4:3 screen ratio when everything else on the market *including their own devices such as the iPhone* are all widescreen? The original iPad was perhaps forgivable but this is the third one now. Wake up Apple, 4:3 is dead!

By CeltiKaos on 26 Mar 2012

Widescreen tablets?

What is the fascination with 'Widescreen' displays? Do we see in that format? Not really. Films have traditionally used Widescreen because cinema screens were easier to make wider than taller. But now we have loads of cheap 'widescreen' displays that are usually 1400x768, which is worse than the 6-year old laptop I'm writing this on. 4x3 is a good balance between 'Square' and 'Widescreen', and it can used in both protrait and landscape aspects depending on the situation. Can you imagine a 16x9 tablet held in portrait mode? Useless.

By Wilbert3 on 26 Mar 2012

Widescreen tablets?

Um does shortscreen sound good?
It means the same thing!

By old_nic on 26 Mar 2012

Widescreen tablets?

Um does shortscreen sound good?
It means the same thing!

By old_nic on 26 Mar 2012

At last - an improvement in display resolution

Apple seems to have set a standard for the other manufactures to catch up with. For years we've been plagues with an ever decreasing vertical screen resolution. Absolutely useless for those who use large spreadsheets and want to edit two full page Word documents side by side. 16:9 displays? Not in my house. That's why I'm still using a 4 year old Dell laptop with a 1920 x 1200 display.

By Jaydax on 27 Mar 2012

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Award-winning Laptops
Best Buy
Google Nexus 10
Best Budget Buy
Packard Bell EasyNote TE11HC
Best Business Buy
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon
Ultimate
Apple iPad 4

Acer Aspire Timeline U M5-581TG review

Acer Aspire Timeline U M5-581TG

Category: Laptops
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £600
Apple iPad Mini review

Apple iPad Mini

Category: Laptops
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £269
Lenovo Ideapad Z585 review

Lenovo Ideapad Z585

Category: Laptops
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £399
Toshiba Satellite L955D-104 review

Toshiba Satellite L955D-104

Category: Laptops
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £479
Toshiba Satellite U940-11N review

Toshiba Satellite U940-11N

Category: Laptops
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £550
Sponsored Links
 

advertisement

Also in this category...
 
Computer Shopper

advertisement


advertisement


 
 

Expert Reviews Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.