Panasonic HC-X900 review
Produces footage with fantastic colour reproduction, but it isn’t that different from last year’s model
Review Date: 7 Feb 2012
Price when reviewed: £898
Reviewed By: Andrew Unsworth
Like its predecessor, the Panasonic HDC-SD900, the Panasonic HC-X900 is a full HD camcorder has three separate sensors for red, green and blue light; these help it capture more accurate colours and more detail, while reducing noise, compared to single-chip camcorders. The camera supports 1080/50p video as well as 1080i and PAL. The new model adds updated image stabilisation and an auto-stereoscopic screen for glasses-free 3D viewing with the optional 3D adaptor.
It’s a medium-sized camcorder which feels well-balanced in your hand, and all the major controls, such as zoom and record, are within easy reach of your fingers. You can either view the action using the flip-out resistive touchscreen or you can use the electronic viewfinder. Even though we’re now used to super-sensitive capacitive screens, the HC-X900’s resistive model is still responsive and it's easy to select the function you need. The touchscreen makes it easy to preview your footage, as it's uncluttered by too much information. There's also an electronic viewfinder for if you have trouble using the screen in direct sunlight.
The HC-X900's three 1/4.1in sensors deliver fantastic video in daylight, but footage does suffer from noticeable noise in darker environments, as was the case with the HDC-SD900. In good lighting, the three colour sensors capture scenes accurately, and even when surveying a panoramic scene, such as that from our rooftop, objects to the extreme left and right of the screen retain their colour and definition.
The camcorder's sensor specifications are identical to those of the previous-generation HDC-SD900, but the camera does add 'pixel shift technology', where the green sensor is slightly offset relative to the red and blue, which helps the sensor to capture four pixels instead of one each frame. This, Panasonic claims, means the camera captures four times the pixel count of Full HD so has more information to use when processing the final video image, leading to greater accuracy. Even so, it isn’t greatly different from that captured by the HDC-SD900. Brighter colours look slightly more natural, but when they’re compared to footage captured by the HDC-SD900 last year, the difference isn’t overwhelming.
Thanks for your review Andrew. I think some people might be interested in the better WA of the new lens of the X900 though. The X900 is 29.8-368.8mm (16:9, 35mm equiv.) compared with the 35.0-420mm of the SD900. That's quite a bit wider at full WA while still retaining the f/1.5 aperture. That may mean the difference between needing a WA adapter and not needing one for some people.
By ianperegian on 8 Feb 2012
i dont know what to buy now. a review on camcorder info put the x900 below the sd900. a user on avforums who has tried both has sent back the x900. on avsforums they said the tm900 has beeping noises and some dont focus well.
By cypher007_uk on 8 Mar 2012
Find a review