Skip to navigation
Login|Register
Log In

Remember me

RSS Feeds

Casio Exilim EX-FH25 review

Verdict:

Slow-motion and 40fps continuous capture are great but image quality lets it down

Review Date: 13 May 2010

Price when reviewed: £295

Supplier: http://www.parkcameras.com

Reviewed By: Ben Pitt

Our Rating 3 stars out of 5

User Rating 5 stars out of 5

Powered by Reevoo

The FH25 is an update to the FH20 we reviewed 19 months ago (see What’s New, Shopper 251 - http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/digital-cameras/238827/casio-exilim-ex-fh20). This new model swaps the FH20’s 9-megapixel sensor for a 10-megapixel back-illuminated one, but otherwise it’s virtually identical.

Back in 2008, the 20x zoom was as big as they came, but today it’s less remarkable. The 3in screen compares well with the latest designs but the lack of an HDMI output is disappointing. There are lots of photographic options including manual exposure and RAW shooting (albeit only up to ISO 200), but everything is controlled via the navigation pad and menus, which is much slower than dedicated buttons and dials.

Slow-motion video capture is no longer unique to Casio but that makes it no less exciting. The options vary from VGA resolution at 1/4-speed playback to a tiny 224x64 frame at 1/33-speed. The former is great for surreal YouTube clips, while the latter is just the thing for scientific experiments.

Nothing else can match the FH25’s continuous shooting mode. It can capture 30 frames at speeds from 1fps all the way up to 40fps. It can also buffer frames, saving up to 29 from before the shutter was pressed. The FH25 is responsive in general use but it’s slow to start, taking 4.5 seconds to switch on and shoot. The use of AA batteries mean the flash took up to 12 seconds to recycle, and RAW shooting was painfully slow.

Normal-speed videos are recorded at 720p and quality was high in bright light, but low-light clips were noisy. Activating the optical zoom disabled the soundtrack completely, which seems a little melodramatic.

Out testing revealed that this lens isn’t as sharp as its competitors, and it displayed heavy chromatic aberrations at telephoto settings. Noise wasn’t terrible at high ISO speeds but Casio’s noise reduction processing struggled to clean up images. The automatic mode made some daft decisions that resulted in unnecessarily blurry or noisy shots.

We love the turbo-charged continuous mode, but it isn’t enough to excuse other weaknesses.

Prev Next

User Reviews

< Previous   Reviews : Digital cameras Next >
Sponsored Links
Be the first to comment on this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Award-winning Digital cameras

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS review

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 2 out of 5
Price: £153
Sony NEX-7 review

Sony NEX-7

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £1,129
Magix Music Maker MX review

Magix Music Maker MX

Category: Software
Rating: 2 out of 5
Price: £40
Samsung MV800 review

Samsung MV800

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £190
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 review

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £700
Digital SLR buying guide

Digital SLR buying guide

Find out all you need to know about choosing the right Digital SLR camera.

Read more

Ultrazoom digital camera buying guide

Ultrazoom digital camera buying guide

Find out all you need to know about choosing the right ultrazoom digital camera.

Read more

 

advertisement

Also in this category...
 
Computer Shopper

advertisement


advertisement


 
 

Expert Reviews Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.