Sony NEX-5N review

One big reservation we had with the NEX-5 was that shot-to-shot times averaged 2.8 seconds on typical settings. That time is now down to 0.65 seconds. The 10fps continuous mode only lasted for four shots before slowing to 2.6fps for JPEGs and 1fps for raw – that’s below par compared to its peers but we could live with it. Autofocus performance was more of a concern. The camera focused and captured within half a second in bright conditions, but in low light it took up to two seconds. It’s a common problem for CSCs but the 5N is affected more than usual.

Our test unit was supplied by Jessops, where the NEX-5N is available with a 3x zoom lens for £600, but for the same money it’s also available with both the zoom lens and a wide-angle pancake lens. This bundle gives the flexibility of having a zoom function when you need it and a slim 55mm profile and 340g weight for when portability is more important.

Sadly, these lenses didn’t excel for sharpness, with slightly soft focus towards the edges of frames at wide apertures. The pancake lens has an f/2.8 maximum aperture, but automatic settings sensibly opted for f/4 to keep shots sharp, even in low light. As such, this lens really only offers a size advantage over the zoom lens, and without stabilisation built in, isn’t as good in low light.

It’s worth noting that the flash is a small detachable unit so it can be left at home when it’s not needed. However, we often set off without it and later regretted it. An integrated flash is preferable, although it would inevitably push up the camera’s bulk. To its credit, this flash is quick to recycle, shooting at full power every 2.3 seconds – twice as fast as most integrated flashes.

Sony’s NEX system can’t match Panasonic and Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds for the number and quality of lenses, and it’s lagging behind for autofocus speed too. The audible clicks and overheating issues are annoying blemishes on what is otherwise the best video mode we’ve seen.

Ultimately, though, the positives outweigh the negatives. Photo quality is significantly better than its rivals, it’s responsive, easy to use and packed with fun and genuinely useful extras. It’s quite a bit pricier than the Sony NEX-C3, but its 1080-50p videos with manual exposure, wider ISO range, touchscreen and magnesium alloy body make it worth the extra. We also found that the 5N had a slight advantage over the C3 for image quality, thanks to digital correction of chromatic aberrations, lens distortions and vignetting, as well as lower noise in its JPEGs.

The Nikon 1 J1 comes close to matching the 5N and is a little cheaper in single-lens kit form, and the forthcoming Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 looks like it will give the 5N a serious run for its money. For now, though, the NEX-5N is the best CSC we’ve seen.