Monitors
- best buy
LG Flatron E2750V review The E2750V has a choice of three inputs, a unique folding stand and excellent image quality -
BenQ EW2420 review The EW2420 has a VA TFT panel with a glossy finish, and stunning still image quality, but moving images suffer from ghosting.£157 -
Asus VG236H review We enjoyed 3D gaming on this monitor, but it’s very expensive and not compatible with the key standard for 3D imaging – HDMI 1.4a.£370 -
AOC F22+ review A decent budget monitor, but despite offering fine control of image quality, the dull CCFL backlight and poor contrast detract£100 -
BenQ VW2420H review Excellent contrast and great viewing angles, but colours are a little cold and power consumption isn't as low as other LED monitors.£175 -
ViewSonic VX2250wm-LED review Good image quality, but the design isn't particularly attractive and it costs a little more than the competition.£138 -
Samsung SyncMaster BX2240 review We’ve no major complaints about image quality, but the BX2240 isn’t outstanding in most respects£158 -
BenQ V2410T review Image quality is unremarkable, but the low power consumption and adjustable stand mean this 24in LED monitor is still a good choice for some.£173 -
Acer T231H review The T231H isn't a bad touchscreen monitor, but it's simply too expensive to recommend.£310 -
Viewsonic VX1932wm-LED review The LED backlight might tick the 'cutting edge technology' box, but you can buy larger, higher-resolution and better-quality monitors for similar money.£113 -
BenQ G920WL review The G920WL has good contrast, natural colours and a functional design, but the low resolution and two year warranty let it down£95 -
Acer B223WG review The B223WG has good, but not outstanding, picture quality. Its adjustable stand is a highlight, but cheaper rivals have higher resolutions and deliver better quality.£140 -
Iiyama ProLite E2210HDS-1 review A slight red cast spoils what is otherwise good image quality. Plus, at this price it can't compete with BenQ's cheaper G2222HDL£140