Monitors
-
Samsung SyncMaster BX2240 review We’ve no major complaints about image quality, but the BX2240 isn’t outstanding in most respects£158
-
BenQ V2410T review Image quality is unremarkable, but the low power consumption and adjustable stand mean this 24in LED monitor is still a good choice for some.£173
-
Acer T231H review The T231H isn't a bad touchscreen monitor, but it's simply too expensive to recommend.£310
-
Viewsonic VX1932wm-LED review The LED backlight might tick the 'cutting edge technology' box, but you can buy larger, higher-resolution and better-quality monitors for similar money.£113
-
BenQ G920WL review The G920WL has good contrast, natural colours and a functional design, but the low resolution and two year warranty let it down£95
-
Acer B223WG review The B223WG has good, but not outstanding, picture quality. Its adjustable stand is a highlight, but cheaper rivals have higher resolutions and deliver better quality.£140
-
Iiyama ProLite E2210HDS-1 review A slight red cast spoils what is otherwise good image quality. Plus, at this price it can't compete with BenQ's cheaper G2222HDL£140
-
LG Flatron E2350V review It looks gorgeous and has a clever folding stand, but it's let down by a cold-looking image and a fairly high price£168
-
Asus VW266H review The VW266H has reasonably good picture quality, but it's not as good value as Iiyama's larger E2710HDSD-1£265
-
Samsung SyncMaster F2080 review The height-adjustable stand and wide viewing angles are convenient, but image quality is below par and the price is way too high£145
-
HannsG HH222DPB review It may be cheap, but the HH222DPB doesn't have a Full HD resolution or HDCP support£108
-
NEC MultiSync EA222WMe review Packed with features and excellent image quality, but it has only a 1,680x1,050 resolution. At this high price, it's relatively poor value£220
-
AOC E2236Vwa review The E2236Vwa's image quality is average, the menu is frustrating, and there's no HDCP support£136