Skip to navigation

ZTE Blade 3 review

  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3

Verdict:

A cheap as chips and perfectly pleasant to use prepay smartphone

Review Date: 22 Feb 2013

Price when reviewed: £80

Supplier: http://www.virginmobile.co.uk

Reviewed By: Chris Finnamore

Our Rating 4 stars out of 5

ExpertReviews Award

ZTE is known as a maker of budget handsets, but the company has three distinct inexpensive smartphone ranges. There's Kis at the bottom, Grand at the top and in the middle sits Blade.

The Blade 3 is ZTE's latest mid-range handset, and as we expected, it doesn’t cost very much. At £80 on prepay with Virgin Mobile it's one of the cheapest Android handsets there is. ZTE says it will be available SIM-free, but we've yet to find anyone stocking an unlocked handset.

ZTE Blade 3

Apart from the fact the phone is SIM-locked to Virgin, you don’t get any prepay branding shoved down your throat. The Blade 3 runs an almost-stock version of Android 4.0.4, and the handset is plain, understated and good-looking, with a rubberised back and raised chin to help protect the screen against knocks. It's also remarkably heavy for a small handset, and feels pretty weighty in your hand. We actually rather liked the weight, as it helps make the phone feel tough and well made; an impression helped by the exposed metal chassis around the edge of the handset.

The touchscreen is responsive, which makes a welcome change from that of phones such as the Huawei Ascend G 300, which had us stabbing at the onscreen keyboard when typing. This isn’t the fastest phone we’ve ever seen, though. The 1GHz single-core processor means there's some slight jerkiness when flicking through app screens and a slight hesitation when opening apps, compared to the lightning-quick responses of a high-end smartphone.

The slow performance was borne out in our benchmark tests. In the Sunspider JavaScript benchmark, the Blade 3 completed the test in 2,587ms. This is a slow result, and what we were expecting from a single-core chip. We saw the difference in web browsing to a certain degree, in that desktop mode pages took a couple of extra seconds to render compared to the fastest handsets and zooming in and out isn’t particularly smooth, but it wasn't especially distracting.

Prev Next
< Previous   Reviews : Smartphones Next >
Sponsored Links

advertisement

Award-winning Smartphones
Best Buy
Alcatel One Touch Idol S
Best Budget Buy
Nokia Lumia 610
Best Business Buy
RIM BlackBerry Torch
Ultimate
Apple iPhone 5S

Samsung Galaxy Young review

Samsung Galaxy Young

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £116
Google Nexus 5 review

Google Nexus 5

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £299
Alcatel One Touch Idol S review

Alcatel One Touch Idol S

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £130
Nokia Lumia 1320 review

Nokia Lumia 1320

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £281
Motorola Moto X review

Motorola Moto X

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £264
Sponsored Links
 

advertisement

Also in this category...
 

advertisement


advertisement


 
 

Expert Reviews Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.