Skip to navigation

ZTE Blade 3 review

  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3
  • ZTE Blade 3

Verdict:

A cheap as chips and perfectly pleasant to use prepay smartphone

Review Date: 22 Feb 2013

Price when reviewed: £80

Supplier: http://www.virginmobile.co.uk

Reviewed By: Chris Finnamore

Our Rating 4 stars out of 5

ExpertReviews Award

ZTE is known as a maker of budget handsets, but the company has three distinct inexpensive smartphone ranges. There's Kis at the bottom, Grand at the top and in the middle sits Blade.

The Blade 3 is ZTE's latest mid-range handset, and as we expected, it doesn’t cost very much. At £80 on prepay with Virgin Mobile it's one of the cheapest Android handsets there is. ZTE says it will be available SIM-free, but we've yet to find anyone stocking an unlocked handset.

ZTE Blade 3

Apart from the fact the phone is SIM-locked to Virgin, you don’t get any prepay branding shoved down your throat. The Blade 3 runs an almost-stock version of Android 4.0.4, and the handset is plain, understated and good-looking, with a rubberised back and raised chin to help protect the screen against knocks. It's also remarkably heavy for a small handset, and feels pretty weighty in your hand. We actually rather liked the weight, as it helps make the phone feel tough and well made; an impression helped by the exposed metal chassis around the edge of the handset.

The touchscreen is responsive, which makes a welcome change from that of phones such as the Huawei Ascend G 300, which had us stabbing at the onscreen keyboard when typing. This isn’t the fastest phone we’ve ever seen, though. The 1GHz single-core processor means there's some slight jerkiness when flicking through app screens and a slight hesitation when opening apps, compared to the lightning-quick responses of a high-end smartphone.

The slow performance was borne out in our benchmark tests. In the Sunspider JavaScript benchmark, the Blade 3 completed the test in 2,587ms. This is a slow result, and what we were expecting from a single-core chip. We saw the difference in web browsing to a certain degree, in that desktop mode pages took a couple of extra seconds to render compared to the fastest handsets and zooming in and out isn’t particularly smooth, but it wasn't especially distracting.

Prev Next
< Previous   Reviews : Smartphones Next >
Sponsored Links

advertisement

Award-winning Smartphones
Best Buy
Samsung Galaxy S5
Best Budget Buy
Nokia Lumia 610
Best Business Buy
RIM BlackBerry Torch
Ultimate
Apple iPhone 5S

Sony Xperia Z2 review

Sony Xperia Z2

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £535
HTC One Max review

HTC One Max

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £564
LG G2 review

LG G2

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £462
HTC Desire 500 review

HTC Desire 500

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 3 out of 5
Price: £210
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 review

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £175
Sponsored Links
 

advertisement

Also in this category...
 

advertisement


advertisement


 
 

Expert Reviews Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.