Login|Register
Log In

Remember me

EyeSpy247 EyeSpy247PTZ review

Verdict:

Although the EyeSpy247PTZ camera is unremarkable, the web-based security monitoring service it comes with is outstanding.

Review Date: 19 Jun 2010

Price when reviewed: £180

Supplier: http://www.amazon.co.uk

Our Rating 4 stars out of 5

EyeSpy247 is an online security monitoring service that takes the hassle out of configuring and viewing your IP security camera over the internet. The EyeSpy247PTZ camera is designed to seamlessly integrate with this web-based monitoring system. It’s intended for indoor security use, and isn’t toughened for exposure to the elements.

'PTZ' stands for pan, tilt and zoom. It pans and tilts alright, but the zoom is digital rather than optical, and so pixellates badly as soon as you go above 1x magnification. It also has body heat motion detection, a connector block for external monitoring inputs like door sensors, a built in microphone and a 3.5mm speaker output.

Faces and events on camera were clearly identifiable and colour balance was better than that of many IP cameras, but we noticed significant pixellation along smooth edges. Although the box claims that the camera has "night vision LEDs", it isn't infra-red; it just has four ultra-bright white LEDs. They effectively illuminate their surroundings after dark, but also draw attention to the camera, so your intruder will know they’ve been rumbled. They're painful to look at, kept switching on and off for no apparent reason under all light levels and came on even after we tried to deactivate them.

We were impressed by EyeSpy's remote monitoring service, which takes all the effort out of configuration by setting up DDNS domain forwarding, email alerts and mobile phone video streaming for you. All you have to do is enter a user name and password in the camera's interface and it'll automatically link itself to your account on the EyeSpy247 website, give you a one-year account worth £25 and start monitoring its surroundings. It even seamlessly reconnected itself when we moved it to a completely different router and internet connection. A simple scheduling page allows you to determine exactly when content will be captured and whether you'd rather capture video or still images, as well as when alerts are sent. It's easy to view captured security footage or a live feed from the camera.

By comparison, it comes with particularly poor Windows control and monitoring software, with a recorder that is prone to crashing and a player that has trouble loading saved video files. It also took a long time and many mouse clicks to make the camera pan around the room. The camera's built in web interface is good, though, and worked well with both Firefox and IE. You can monitor the video stream, pan and tilt the camera and switch its lights on and off, although panning was still slow.

Although it's more expensive than Solwise's SEC-C1062W, the EyeSpy247PTZ isn't too badly priced compared to most pan and tilt cameras. It works well enough when left alone, although we disliked its unpredictable lights and poor Windows software. EyeSpy's web-based monitoring interface did a lot to make up for this, making this a good buy for users who don’t mind paying a subscription for hassle-free web access to their camera.

Author: Kat Orphanides

Prev Next

Social Bookmark this article: What is this?

< Previous   Reviews : IP cameras
User comments

Are white LEDs bad?

I can't make a comment on the camera or the eyespy service as I don't have either.

But, as I've discussed elsewhere before, I'm curious about the hang up people seem to have with this term 'night vision'.

I accept that IR LEDs have been the more accepted way to view images and video on IP cams in night mode (i.e. complete darkness) but as there are inherent issues with IR LEDs such as grainy b/w video plus colour renditioning problems in daylight conditions I don't see why for most people white light LEDs do not actually work perfectly well and in some respects better than IR LEDs?

I've had a couple of Axis M1031W cams in my shop now for about 6 months and they have white light LEDs instead of IR ones and, for me, they are more preferable because they provide better quality night mode colour images and video and during daylight the video colour is really very good compared with, say, a Y-cam which I have also used before but just didn't like the quality of the video output (which imho is very important).

So I do think white light LEDs do have a place and it really depends on the trade offs you are willing to accept. So could we please have a bit more of a balanced view on these things? :)

By smify on 19 Jun 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Award-winning IP cameras
Best Buy
Compro IP70
Best Budget Buy
Solwise SEC-C1002-IR

Compro IP70 review

Compro IP70

Category: IP cameras
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £89
Solwise SEC-C1002-IR review

Solwise SEC-C1002-IR

Category: IP cameras
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £98
Y-Cam Black SD review

Y-Cam Black SD

Category: IP cameras
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £170
Solwise SEC-C1062W review

Solwise SEC-C1062W

Category: IP cameras
Rating: 5 out of 5
Price: £114
Sitecom WL-404 review

Sitecom WL-404

Category: IP cameras
Rating: 4 out of 5
Price: £108
Camcorder buying guide

Camcorder buying guide

Find out all you need to know about choosing the right camcorder.

Read more

 

advertisement

Sponsored Links
Also in this category...
Broadband

150+ broadband packages

Compare 30+ mobile broadband deals

Powered by Top 10 Broadband

 

advertisement


 
 

Expert Reviews Printed from www.expertreviews.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.